

Europe: Comparing Solar Keymark Data on Collectors with Foil or Double Glass Cover to Ones Without

Photo: KBB
Some of the products shown in the database come from pioneers in the manufacture of large-scale flat plate collectors, such as Arcon from Denmark, Ökotech from Austria and Aquasol from Germany. But the list also includes more recent units, for example, from OEM collector manufacturers Greenonetec (Austria) and KBB Kollektorbau (Germany) as well as Savo-Solar (Finland). Savo-Solar uses complete direct-flow absorbers made from an aluminium multi-port extrusion profile.
As district heating networks often operate at higher temperatures, better insulation is required to increase collector efficiency at return temperatures of 50 to 70 °C. Several products have either a double-glass cover or a foil between the glass cover and the absorber to reduce convection losses. Additionally, some manufacturers use antireflective coating on their glass covers to improve transmission properties.
About 20 % higher yield at 75 °C if collectors double-glazed or foil-insulated
The annual collector yield shown on Solar Keymark certificates for different temperatures makes it possible to compare large-scale collector modules (above 10 m² of gross collector area) with or without a foil or second glass cover. The table below states annual average yields per square meter of gross collector area at a mean temperature of 50 or 75 °C. The increase in efficiency becomes more apparent at higher temperatures. Collectors with a foil or second glass cover produce, on average, 22 % more kilowatt-hours at 75 °C, whereas the increase is only 10 % at 50 °C.
Individual output figures from the certificates are not published in this article, because some certificates of collectors above 10 m² are part of a certificate family. Their yield has merely been extrapolated from the smaller collector types of the same product line, which lowers the rating. Other large-scale collector types have been tested separately, which has caused their rating to improve. Correspondingly, there is a big gap between the best and the worst collector module in terms of performance. This effect is clearly visible in the category of single-glass collectors. The output of individually tested models (up to 416 kWh/m²a) is almost twice as high as that of low-yield family-tested products, where it can get down to 220 kWh/m²a. Among the double-glazed or foil-insulated collectors, the difference at 75 °C is not as large (31 % between 354 and 462 kWh/m²a).
|
| Annual specific yield at 50 °C in Würzburg | Annual specific yield at 75 °C in Würzburg |
Collectors with foil or second glass cover | Average specific yield of five collector modules | 575 | 411 |
Collector showing largest yield | 623 | 462 | |
Collector showing lowest yield | 509 | 354 | |
Collector with single glass cover | Average specific yield of seven collector modules | 522 | 338 |
Collector showing largest yield | 606 | 416 | |
Collector showing lowest yield | 389 | 220 |
The above-shown average collector yield figures were calculated based on 12 different certificates from the following manufacturers: Aquasol Solartechnik, Arcon-Sunmark, Greenonetec, KBB Kollektorbau, Ökotech Solarkollektoren, Savo-Solar and SST Solar.
Source: http://www.solarkeymark.dk/CollectorCertificates, calculations: solrico
Websites of companies mentioned in this article: